Monday, January 29, 2007
To the Council in Leisnig in Collaboration with Jonas
To the honorable and wise mayor and council in Leisnig, our especially good friends.
At the outset our friendly desire to serve. Honorable and wise, especially good friends! Your writing concerning M.W., your herr-pastor, we have received and with much distress in hearing of such wrong doing: for this reason we have written to him sharply and severely with confidence that he will acknowldedge and take our admonition to heart henceforth rightly doing the proper thing in this matter. If not,upon further complaint,it will likely be received by our gracious Herr, the Elector. We plead with you to be an acceptable mediator so that between your Herr-pastor and M.Antonio there will be a harmonious and friendly attitude preserved and that you do not permit the above named preacher to depart. This, without doubt, would be especially favorable to our gracious Lord. Thus we would want to deserve your personal friendliness. Dated at Wittenberg on the Thursday after Judica (26 March) 1534. Justus Jonas,Probst and Martin Luther, Ecclesiastics in Wittenberg,both D.
Note: Antonio is Lauterbach.
At the outset our friendly desire to serve. Honorable and wise, especially good friends! Your writing concerning M.W., your herr-pastor, we have received and with much distress in hearing of such wrong doing: for this reason we have written to him sharply and severely with confidence that he will acknowldedge and take our admonition to heart henceforth rightly doing the proper thing in this matter. If not,upon further complaint,it will likely be received by our gracious Herr, the Elector. We plead with you to be an acceptable mediator so that between your Herr-pastor and M.Antonio there will be a harmonious and friendly attitude preserved and that you do not permit the above named preacher to depart. This, without doubt, would be especially favorable to our gracious Lord. Thus we would want to deserve your personal friendliness. Dated at Wittenberg on the Thursday after Judica (26 March) 1534. Justus Jonas,Probst and Martin Luther, Ecclesiastics in Wittenberg,both D.
Note: Antonio is Lauterbach.
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Luther Wedding Ring
Home
Scripts for Sale
Future Dates
Laurel Bio
Martin Bio
Katie Bio
Reviews
Credits
Photo Gallery
Contact Us
When Martin Luther proposed (was betrothed) to Katharina von Bora the ring he gave her was quite elaborate. The components of this ring have been described somewhat differently by various sources. When we were in Germany, my husband John bought me a replica of Katie's wedding ring at Wartburg Castle. I treasure this beautiful ring which is worn on the index finger of my left hand as Katie wore hers in her wedding portrait painted by Lucas Cranach. I'd like to share these various descriptions with you:
"The betrothal ring of Martin Luther with Catharine Von Bora, which is composed of an intricate device of gold work, set with a ruby, the emblem of exalted love. The gold devices represent all the symbols of the "Passion." In the center is the crucified Saviour; on one side the spear with which the side was pierced, and the rod of reeds; on the other is a branch of hyssop; beneath are the dice with which the soldiers cast lots for the garment without a seam, and below are the three nails. The whole is arranged so as to make a large cross, surmounted by the ruby. Inside the ring are the names of the bethrothed pair and the wedding day in German: Der 13 Janij, 1525. This ring was presented to the intended wife at the betrothal and worn by her after marriage."
The description which accompanied my ring was written, of course, in German. Karl and Anneliese Metz translated the text for me:
"Wedding ring from Martin Luther: a copy made after a description from the 16th century. On June 13th (1525) Katharina von Bora and Martin Luther married at Wittenberg. As a wedding ring they used possibly a ring like Katharina as a nun used as an engagement to Christ. This wedding ring is made according to a description from an old Latin source. It shows the crucifixion of Christ together with the torture tools. These are a ladder, a lance, a whip, a scepter to mock the king's majesty, the rod with the vinegar sponge, a sword, a robe and a bow. On the cross beam you see three burning hearts which display the misery of mother Mary. The red stone in the middle - a karfunkel - is a sign of the blood of Christ. All details are shown precisely in our original. The stone is true Bohemian "garnet." The size of the stone is authentic. We guarantee this with our firm logo. (--Kienast)"
[In the United States, replicas of Katie's wedding band can be purchased through James Avery Craftsman, Inc., Harper Road, P.O. Box 291367, Kerrville, TX 78029-1367. They'd be happy to send you one of their catalogs if you call them at 1-800-283-1770.]
Home
Scripts for Sale
Future Dates
Laurel Bio
Martin Bio
Katie Bio
Reviews
Credits
Photo Gallery
Contact Us
When Martin Luther proposed (was betrothed) to Katharina von Bora the ring he gave her was quite elaborate. The components of this ring have been described somewhat differently by various sources. When we were in Germany, my husband John bought me a replica of Katie's wedding ring at Wartburg Castle. I treasure this beautiful ring which is worn on the index finger of my left hand as Katie wore hers in her wedding portrait painted by Lucas Cranach. I'd like to share these various descriptions with you:
"The betrothal ring of Martin Luther with Catharine Von Bora, which is composed of an intricate device of gold work, set with a ruby, the emblem of exalted love. The gold devices represent all the symbols of the "Passion." In the center is the crucified Saviour; on one side the spear with which the side was pierced, and the rod of reeds; on the other is a branch of hyssop; beneath are the dice with which the soldiers cast lots for the garment without a seam, and below are the three nails. The whole is arranged so as to make a large cross, surmounted by the ruby. Inside the ring are the names of the bethrothed pair and the wedding day in German: Der 13 Janij, 1525. This ring was presented to the intended wife at the betrothal and worn by her after marriage."
The description which accompanied my ring was written, of course, in German. Karl and Anneliese Metz translated the text for me:
"Wedding ring from Martin Luther: a copy made after a description from the 16th century. On June 13th (1525) Katharina von Bora and Martin Luther married at Wittenberg. As a wedding ring they used possibly a ring like Katharina as a nun used as an engagement to Christ. This wedding ring is made according to a description from an old Latin source. It shows the crucifixion of Christ together with the torture tools. These are a ladder, a lance, a whip, a scepter to mock the king's majesty, the rod with the vinegar sponge, a sword, a robe and a bow. On the cross beam you see three burning hearts which display the misery of mother Mary. The red stone in the middle - a karfunkel - is a sign of the blood of Christ. All details are shown precisely in our original. The stone is true Bohemian "garnet." The size of the stone is authentic. We guarantee this with our firm logo. (--Kienast)"
[In the United States, replicas of Katie's wedding band can be purchased through James Avery Craftsman, Inc., Harper Road, P.O. Box 291367, Kerrville, TX 78029-1367. They'd be happy to send you one of their catalogs if you call them at 1-800-283-1770.]
#2044-To Spalatin
To the worthy man,Herr Master Georg Spalatin, servant of the Word, and now truly Bishop of the Church in Meissen, his brother.
Grace and peace in Christ! It pleases me that you write, my dear Spalatin, that the nuns in Nimpschen their cloister-habit (nonissmum)want to take off. Nevertheless, may I ask them to take heed when they want to leave the cloister what they will do ( since I have supported many nuns at great cost, what they will do on the outside whether they sufficiently become aware of the same, and are aware what they will suffer from their relatives and brothers so they do not regret their exit. Thus I do not advise that they can be completely confident. If perhaps the Prince grants them to be paid a rich gift when they leave they will not yet be able to live very long if at their place (where they want to go) makes it uncertain as to their enduring care. For this reason, if they are not certain of a marriage partner or confidently hope for the same, I advise that they do not exit. Regarding the times leaves no doubt that it would be better for them stay, withot doubt, in the cloister.
What concerns the correction of the servants of the Church I hold that the jurisdiction of the Visitors be according to each in his district if there is not a public and death-worthy transgression present which must be punished by the sword such as murder,rebellion, arson, marriage-breaking,etc. The rest the Visitors may punish either through deposing from office or in other ways as we have previously done. Further, if it pleases you, in three years leave the parish vacant then deliver it to the worldly jurisdiction, that is, the lambs to the wolves. The peasants, citizens and nobel people have a natural hate toward the pastors. And moreover,the pastors are required by the Word, namely, to accuse them; now the enemy has become their judge. Whoever wants to continue or will not admit that they have already afflicted their pastor sufficiently indicates that the peasants,and citizens as well as the nobility have need of a worldly judge rather than a shepherd(pastore).
The LOrd be with you,Amen. On the day of the man-becoming of the Son of God (25 March) 1534. Marin L.,Doctor.
NOTE: What does Kaethe think of the advice to the nuns at Nimpfschen which she left about ten years ago?
Grace and peace in Christ! It pleases me that you write, my dear Spalatin, that the nuns in Nimpschen their cloister-habit (nonissmum)want to take off. Nevertheless, may I ask them to take heed when they want to leave the cloister what they will do ( since I have supported many nuns at great cost, what they will do on the outside whether they sufficiently become aware of the same, and are aware what they will suffer from their relatives and brothers so they do not regret their exit. Thus I do not advise that they can be completely confident. If perhaps the Prince grants them to be paid a rich gift when they leave they will not yet be able to live very long if at their place (where they want to go) makes it uncertain as to their enduring care. For this reason, if they are not certain of a marriage partner or confidently hope for the same, I advise that they do not exit. Regarding the times leaves no doubt that it would be better for them stay, withot doubt, in the cloister.
What concerns the correction of the servants of the Church I hold that the jurisdiction of the Visitors be according to each in his district if there is not a public and death-worthy transgression present which must be punished by the sword such as murder,rebellion, arson, marriage-breaking,etc. The rest the Visitors may punish either through deposing from office or in other ways as we have previously done. Further, if it pleases you, in three years leave the parish vacant then deliver it to the worldly jurisdiction, that is, the lambs to the wolves. The peasants, citizens and nobel people have a natural hate toward the pastors. And moreover,the pastors are required by the Word, namely, to accuse them; now the enemy has become their judge. Whoever wants to continue or will not admit that they have already afflicted their pastor sufficiently indicates that the peasants,and citizens as well as the nobility have need of a worldly judge rather than a shepherd(pastore).
The LOrd be with you,Amen. On the day of the man-becoming of the Son of God (25 March) 1534. Marin L.,Doctor.
NOTE: What does Kaethe think of the advice to the nuns at Nimpfschen which she left about ten years ago?
Saturday, January 27, 2007
#2043-to Nicolaus Hausmann
In Christ, the highly-honorable man,Herr Nicolaus Hausmann,Master,and faithful servant of the Word in Dessau, his very dear brother.
Grace and peace in Christ! There is nothing I might write, worthy man, only that I want Herr Christoph to give witness,as he is here with me,as he asks me to give witness to support the answer that it pleases me that he there by you take up the office of Ecclesiastic. You would afford yourself of the service of a good promoter. May you take it the right way that I have not sent back your (church)Order because I am embarrassed that I am so pressed and presumed to mark and delete several articles. In time, as God wills, it will become explicit. Christ be with you. Pray for me.My lord Kaethe greets you respectfully. On the Monday after Judica (23 March) 1534. Your Martin Luther,D.
Grace and peace in Christ! There is nothing I might write, worthy man, only that I want Herr Christoph to give witness,as he is here with me,as he asks me to give witness to support the answer that it pleases me that he there by you take up the office of Ecclesiastic. You would afford yourself of the service of a good promoter. May you take it the right way that I have not sent back your (church)Order because I am embarrassed that I am so pressed and presumed to mark and delete several articles. In time, as God wills, it will become explicit. Christ be with you. Pray for me.My lord Kaethe greets you respectfully. On the Monday after Judica (23 March) 1534. Your Martin Luther,D.
Friday, January 26, 2007
#2042-To Nicolaus Hausmann in Dessau
To the very honorable man in Christ, Herr Nicolaus Hausmann, the faithful servant of the Word in Dessau, his very dear brother.
Grace and peace in Christ! Your Church Order, my worthy man, I have read and told Master Forcheim (Georg Held) that it does not seem advisable that you should print it and make it publicly known. It has for a long time become regrettable that we have published our Reformation (meant by that is meant the German Mass and Order of Worship: "Deutsche Messe und Ordung des Gottesdienst) whereby all others were given an example and with their also being published the variety and number has grown without end so that soon the waters and woods will be overflowing with paper. I have advised rather that the copy be held back and that the pastprs be written simply indicating what and how much they should do for a time ,as under the Papacy the (so called) divine ordinances were handed over, so that the same gradually through practice and the matter establishes itself without tradition and writing or deception. Thus the things with us or other neighbors would be as symmetrical as possible so that we don't open the mouths of the Papists and Sects to whowl and blaspheme about us and become highly upset, (causing) divisions as M. Georg will exstensively report to you. I request that you might excuse him: because of my fault he gives you a very slow answer; he has become a very earnest Organizer however
I was hindered before breakfast in using pen and paper because of the pain in my head
so I cannot, because of the air of this year, hurry. The LOrd Jesus be with you and your very good Prince to pray to the LOrd for me. Your pure and plain and earnest devotion for Christ gives me more joy than I can express. Christ Himself, the very sweetest, support and increase your faith through His certain, holy and joyful Spirit (Psalm 51:12-14), Amen. Pray for me and be it right well with you in Christ. On the day before Judica Sunday (21 March) Anno 1534. Your Martin Luther.
Grace and peace in Christ! Your Church Order, my worthy man, I have read and told Master Forcheim (Georg Held) that it does not seem advisable that you should print it and make it publicly known. It has for a long time become regrettable that we have published our Reformation (meant by that is meant the German Mass and Order of Worship: "Deutsche Messe und Ordung des Gottesdienst) whereby all others were given an example and with their also being published the variety and number has grown without end so that soon the waters and woods will be overflowing with paper. I have advised rather that the copy be held back and that the pastprs be written simply indicating what and how much they should do for a time ,as under the Papacy the (so called) divine ordinances were handed over, so that the same gradually through practice and the matter establishes itself without tradition and writing or deception. Thus the things with us or other neighbors would be as symmetrical as possible so that we don't open the mouths of the Papists and Sects to whowl and blaspheme about us and become highly upset, (causing) divisions as M. Georg will exstensively report to you. I request that you might excuse him: because of my fault he gives you a very slow answer; he has become a very earnest Organizer however
I was hindered before breakfast in using pen and paper because of the pain in my head
so I cannot, because of the air of this year, hurry. The LOrd Jesus be with you and your very good Prince to pray to the LOrd for me. Your pure and plain and earnest devotion for Christ gives me more joy than I can express. Christ Himself, the very sweetest, support and increase your faith through His certain, holy and joyful Spirit (Psalm 51:12-14), Amen. Pray for me and be it right well with you in Christ. On the day before Judica Sunday (21 March) Anno 1534. Your Martin Luther.
Thursday, January 25, 2007
#2041-To Justus Menius in Eisenach
To the worthy man, Herr Justus Menius, the faithful and wise servant of Christ, his brother in the LOrd.
Grace and peace in Christ. My dear Justus! My illustrious Prince has presented a certain theologian, Hieronymous Weller, with a gratuity (beneficio) in Eisenach, namely 40 Gulden, which should be required from the Wartburg. I request therefore that you find out earnestly by whom these Goldgulden should be remitted, whether the treasurer or the commander, at which time, and whether it should be partially or entirely, and write back to me through this messenger and if perhaps, a part of these 40 Gulden should be given by the day of Philipp and James (May 1) let me know by this messenger. On the Monday after Invocavit (23 Feb) my Prince presented this gift (beneficio) to Hieronymous Weller. Wittenberg, on the Monday after Laetare (16 March) 1534. Your Martin Luther, very busy and not entirely mighty.
NOTES: Eisenach lies just below the Wartburg. The revenue is from the priestly position at the Wartburg. See #2050 coming up. ML says he is not entirely "fest". Wartburg was of course ein' feste Burg.
Grace and peace in Christ. My dear Justus! My illustrious Prince has presented a certain theologian, Hieronymous Weller, with a gratuity (beneficio) in Eisenach, namely 40 Gulden, which should be required from the Wartburg. I request therefore that you find out earnestly by whom these Goldgulden should be remitted, whether the treasurer or the commander, at which time, and whether it should be partially or entirely, and write back to me through this messenger and if perhaps, a part of these 40 Gulden should be given by the day of Philipp and James (May 1) let me know by this messenger. On the Monday after Invocavit (23 Feb) my Prince presented this gift (beneficio) to Hieronymous Weller. Wittenberg, on the Monday after Laetare (16 March) 1534. Your Martin Luther, very busy and not entirely mighty.
NOTES: Eisenach lies just below the Wartburg. The revenue is from the priestly position at the Wartburg. See #2050 coming up. ML says he is not entirely "fest". Wartburg was of course ein' feste Burg.
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
#2040-To one of the Nobility
(The Editiors think that the Nobleman is highly likely Johann von Riedtesel who was godfather of ML's son Martin. The "Doctor Martin" in the last paragraph is little Martin. "D.B." could well be Chancellor D. Christian Beier. "L" is perhaps Landgrafen. "C"= Elector. The son is the student John. The doctor is D. Augustin Schurf.)
Grace and peace in Christ. Valiant, steadfast, dear Herr and Godfather! I have, according to your desire, earnestly and entirely spoken with D.B. about your case. Thereupon he very faithfully advised that I with you keep silent for a while holding back any incitement as we might make it worse. It is yet too soon at the court and your false friends (as I call them) are just new in the regime and there yet have to acquire much wisdom and righteousness as all young regents need to do. The boil is not yet ripe and is too hard and red. With Herr H. I would also be glad to speak but because of his activities I was able able to accomplish it. My gracious lord I did not think it appropriate (as said), according to the advice of D.B., to not involve so as to spare you. Therfore, I plead that, according to advice of D.B., you would yet forgive a little; when my gracious lord comes again I will attempt to speak with Herr H. and thereafter look to how I might approach the man himself.
To approach L. as it now stands would please me except that the part which I have underscored would rather leave out and make it so that my thoughts are made so as that L. does not think as sought and requested by you and perhaps learned from you his former servant and so that he does not by writing but rather speaks orally with C. and the cause find disfavor etc. Or if it is done in writing that it gives no appearance as being done by you but that it is learned from the story going around that there has been no recompense given to you for which you have the seal and letters.Thus I am concerned that if it is written from the Chancery, without petition from L.that it might enrage the gad-flies and bees to persuade the pious prince against you.
On the other matter over which you have concern, namely, about the person in Zoppen, blessed etc., I think, as much as I can from D.B., that you should have no suspicion. As I see it is , as it were, that one wants to be deserving of the gray cloak and prove to be artful as if all previous administrations did nothing and were actually harmful. We are the ones who can advise and help the Prince whereas the others were corrupt etc. Novus rex, nova lex etc. (new king, new laws).And if can again refer to the advice of D.B, so I also think that you should let it smoke awhile so that after it smokes it will smoke itself out.
Your son is holding up fine, he just had the measles and we were ready for them according the advice of D. Augustin; he is now again healthy. My most gracious woman, the Markgraf, is from time to time sick and then again well. Your C.F.G. speaks of you very much honoring and praising you which I am very glad to hear; with you and yours I am ready to comply. Herwith be commended to God. My lord Kaethe would like to greet you and together with your dear one and fruit as does Doctor Martin also. On the Saturday after Oculi (March 14) 1534. Martinus Luther,D.
Grace and peace in Christ. Valiant, steadfast, dear Herr and Godfather! I have, according to your desire, earnestly and entirely spoken with D.B. about your case. Thereupon he very faithfully advised that I with you keep silent for a while holding back any incitement as we might make it worse. It is yet too soon at the court and your false friends (as I call them) are just new in the regime and there yet have to acquire much wisdom and righteousness as all young regents need to do. The boil is not yet ripe and is too hard and red. With Herr H. I would also be glad to speak but because of his activities I was able able to accomplish it. My gracious lord I did not think it appropriate (as said), according to the advice of D.B., to not involve so as to spare you. Therfore, I plead that, according to advice of D.B., you would yet forgive a little; when my gracious lord comes again I will attempt to speak with Herr H. and thereafter look to how I might approach the man himself.
To approach L. as it now stands would please me except that the part which I have underscored would rather leave out and make it so that my thoughts are made so as that L. does not think as sought and requested by you and perhaps learned from you his former servant and so that he does not by writing but rather speaks orally with C. and the cause find disfavor etc. Or if it is done in writing that it gives no appearance as being done by you but that it is learned from the story going around that there has been no recompense given to you for which you have the seal and letters.Thus I am concerned that if it is written from the Chancery, without petition from L.that it might enrage the gad-flies and bees to persuade the pious prince against you.
On the other matter over which you have concern, namely, about the person in Zoppen, blessed etc., I think, as much as I can from D.B., that you should have no suspicion. As I see it is , as it were, that one wants to be deserving of the gray cloak and prove to be artful as if all previous administrations did nothing and were actually harmful. We are the ones who can advise and help the Prince whereas the others were corrupt etc. Novus rex, nova lex etc. (new king, new laws).And if can again refer to the advice of D.B, so I also think that you should let it smoke awhile so that after it smokes it will smoke itself out.
Your son is holding up fine, he just had the measles and we were ready for them according the advice of D. Augustin; he is now again healthy. My most gracious woman, the Markgraf, is from time to time sick and then again well. Your C.F.G. speaks of you very much honoring and praising you which I am very glad to hear; with you and yours I am ready to comply. Herwith be commended to God. My lord Kaethe would like to greet you and together with your dear one and fruit as does Doctor Martin also. On the Saturday after Oculi (March 14) 1534. Martinus Luther,D.
Friday, January 19, 2007
To Elector Johann Friedrich in Saxony (ECFG)
To the illustrious, high-born Prince and Lord Johann Friedrich, Duke in Saxony, Arch-marshall and Elector of the h. (holy) Roman Empire, Landgraf in Thuringia and Markgraf in Meissen, my most favored Lord.
Grace and peace in Christ. Illustrious, high-born Prince, most gracious Lord! With me is the parish-lord of Zwickau, Master Leonhard, and requests of me that since several good Herrs at the Court, the Lord of Wildenfels, and Doctor Christianos Chancellor et al., have all assured him that will faithfully help him by appealing to ECFG that one of priests' houses in Zwickau, which are abandoned or will be abandoned, be given to him for his wife and little children by ECFG because he cannot at this time gather anything of a treasure since there is nothing left over but everything goes from hand to mouth; and since he has such good friends at court who are pleading for him who give good witness for him and furthering his cause he also would have me write to
ECFG on his behalf as I previously know him well as he has grown up by me here and know that he is worthy and those houses must yet be taken care of: thus I plead humbly for him that if it is not burdensome for ECFG that one of these houses be turned over to him. He is yet one of the best and most pious of parish-lords and that I know as much as it is possible to know. ECFG will know well know how graciously to proceed. Christ our LOrd strengthen and make wise ECFG blessedly,Amen. Wednesday after Oculi (11 March) 1534. ECFG's humble Mart. Luther, D.
Grace and peace in Christ. Illustrious, high-born Prince, most gracious Lord! With me is the parish-lord of Zwickau, Master Leonhard, and requests of me that since several good Herrs at the Court, the Lord of Wildenfels, and Doctor Christianos Chancellor et al., have all assured him that will faithfully help him by appealing to ECFG that one of priests' houses in Zwickau, which are abandoned or will be abandoned, be given to him for his wife and little children by ECFG because he cannot at this time gather anything of a treasure since there is nothing left over but everything goes from hand to mouth; and since he has such good friends at court who are pleading for him who give good witness for him and furthering his cause he also would have me write to
ECFG on his behalf as I previously know him well as he has grown up by me here and know that he is worthy and those houses must yet be taken care of: thus I plead humbly for him that if it is not burdensome for ECFG that one of these houses be turned over to him. He is yet one of the best and most pious of parish-lords and that I know as much as it is possible to know. ECFG will know well know how graciously to proceed. Christ our LOrd strengthen and make wise ECFG blessedly,Amen. Wednesday after Oculi (11 March) 1534. ECFG's humble Mart. Luther, D.
Thursday, January 18, 2007
#2038-To Heinrich von Einsiedel in collaboration with the other theologians
To the stoutly-honorable and valiant Heinrich von Einsiedel on Gnanstein (Nanstein), our specially favored Lord and Friend to his personal attention, Gnanstein 1534.
Grace and peace though our LOrd Jesus Christ. Firmly-honorable,favored Lord and Friend! We have read your deal with earnestness and are moved and in addition want you to know that all of us hold that your consideration which we have listed under the letter "F" is Christian and tolerable and on that account the answer to our gracious Lord Duke Georg, as you have made it, is well-pleasing; thus also is the alteration of the contracts of the family-lines (Filiale) agreeable and it is not appropriate that someone of the country should be opposed to it. Also those lords of the benefices and the land's princes can do nothing here. It is now as you have thought, according to the most recent procedure, that the people of the land prince on account will with the least reproach and hindrance go to (another?) parish. Thus perhaps they may go to a different place to hear the Gospel and partake of the Sacrament and as you know that Christians are to be aware on their own responsibility of their danger and you are to have the Mandate of Duke Georg proclaimed so that they do not come unwarned into danger and that while you do not as well pressure them with the Gospel that nevertheless you cannot protect them from Duke Georg. Such also you should indicate to them that while you do not want to remove from them the Gospel you must proclaim for the sake of the land's prince that, as well, they betake themselves to other places so they do not forsake the Gospel, and that each is responsible to recognize his own danger and each one choose understanding preachers which he supports in a Christian way. This we provide not keeping from you our good friendly opinion and are eager to serve you. Given the Tuesday after Reminiscere (3 March) Anno 1534. D. Martinus Luther,Justus Jonas, Doctor; Philippus Mel.; Johannes Bugenhagen,Pomer et al.
I, Jonas, on their direction have signed this.
Note: With the dividing of the feuds of the knights, it seems, there was dispute as to was in charge.
Grace and peace though our LOrd Jesus Christ. Firmly-honorable,favored Lord and Friend! We have read your deal with earnestness and are moved and in addition want you to know that all of us hold that your consideration which we have listed under the letter "F" is Christian and tolerable and on that account the answer to our gracious Lord Duke Georg, as you have made it, is well-pleasing; thus also is the alteration of the contracts of the family-lines (Filiale) agreeable and it is not appropriate that someone of the country should be opposed to it. Also those lords of the benefices and the land's princes can do nothing here. It is now as you have thought, according to the most recent procedure, that the people of the land prince on account will with the least reproach and hindrance go to (another?) parish. Thus perhaps they may go to a different place to hear the Gospel and partake of the Sacrament and as you know that Christians are to be aware on their own responsibility of their danger and you are to have the Mandate of Duke Georg proclaimed so that they do not come unwarned into danger and that while you do not as well pressure them with the Gospel that nevertheless you cannot protect them from Duke Georg. Such also you should indicate to them that while you do not want to remove from them the Gospel you must proclaim for the sake of the land's prince that, as well, they betake themselves to other places so they do not forsake the Gospel, and that each is responsible to recognize his own danger and each one choose understanding preachers which he supports in a Christian way. This we provide not keeping from you our good friendly opinion and are eager to serve you. Given the Tuesday after Reminiscere (3 March) Anno 1534. D. Martinus Luther,Justus Jonas, Doctor; Philippus Mel.; Johannes Bugenhagen,Pomer et al.
I, Jonas, on their direction have signed this.
Note: With the dividing of the feuds of the knights, it seems, there was dispute as to was in charge.
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Sunday, January 14, 2007
Dominica in Albis
Rev. Fr. Leonard Goffine'sThe Church's Year
INSTRUCTION ON THE FIRST SUNDAY AFTER EASTER, CALLED DOMINICA IN ALBIS
Why is this Sunday called Dominica in Albis or White Sunday?
Because on this day the neophytes laid aside the white dress which, as emblem of their innocence, they received on Holy Saturday, and put on their necks an Agnus Dei, made of white wax, and blessed by the pope, to remind them always of the innocence for which they were given, and of the meekness of the Lamb Jesus. For which reason the Church sings at the Introit:
INTROIT As newborn babes, alleluia: desire the rational milk without guile. Alleluia, alleluia, alleluia. (I Pet II. 2.) Rejoice to God our helper: sing aloud to the God of Jacob. (Ps. LXXX.) Glory, &c.
INSTRUCTION ON THE FIRST SUNDAY AFTER EASTER, CALLED DOMINICA IN ALBIS
Why is this Sunday called Dominica in Albis or White Sunday?
Because on this day the neophytes laid aside the white dress which, as emblem of their innocence, they received on Holy Saturday, and put on their necks an Agnus Dei, made of white wax, and blessed by the pope, to remind them always of the innocence for which they were given, and of the meekness of the Lamb Jesus. For which reason the Church sings at the Introit:
INTROIT As newborn babes, alleluia: desire the rational milk without guile. Alleluia, alleluia, alleluia. (I Pet II. 2.) Rejoice to God our helper: sing aloud to the God of Jacob. (Ps. LXXX.) Glory, &c.
#2036-To Leonhard Beier
Grace and Peace! How could I answer you differently, my dear Leonhard, than what we teach here and publicly do in this matter which you ask about? This has not simply come before us once. We do not permit the women to baptize a member, which is partially brought forth or the head which naturally appears at the opening but admonish them they commend this fruit to God, who is not in our hands but in God's as that also is in God's living for many months in the mother's body (as John the Baptist) before birth. How might the fruit, if we would avoid the danger , also be baptized through the pouring of water on the belly (umbilicum) of the mother or similarly over a cloth in which the child is enclosed! For this reason the child which is not yet born be commended to God. This is nothing which we learned from Aristotle and afterward from St. Augustine; that is, that the soul permeates every member, since Augustine, in holy matters, did not appeal to this philosophy. We must follow the Word of God. Namely, the born-again must be already born so we are not as those who St. Emerantina, the mother of St. Anna adored and reversed (retro) things and undertook to baptize the belly of a bride or virgin in the hope of a future fruit which would be sown in that body. I have said this with multiple words. You carry out that this child, who was neither born or nor baptized, be publicly baptized. It would be something else if he were already born and then baptized. Then also it might have been brought to the pastor in the church and its baptism by the witness of the women and through prayer and the laying on of hands be ratified. Be it well with you in Christ. On the Saturday in Albis (21 Feb.) 1534. Your Martin Luther.
NOTE: On Emerentina see above.
The Sunday after Easter was called Dominca in Albis. But what about Sabbatho in Albis? Is 21 February right?
NOTE: On Emerentina see above.
The Sunday after Easter was called Dominca in Albis. But what about Sabbatho in Albis? Is 21 February right?
Saturday, January 13, 2007
#2035-To Nicholaus Hausmann in Dessau
To the highly-respectable man in Christ,Herr Nicolaus Hausmann, the faithful and clear servant of the Word in Dessau, his Superior.
Grace and peace in Christ! M. Georg Held, in your name, dearest Hausmann, has requested that I might illustrate to you what you should preach concerning Baptism especially since your Prince has required this and since the Bishop in Mainz and his brother et al are to be the audience. Though you do not in this matter require my help very much since by God's grace you are rich in the Spirit and at the same time also M. Georg has likely sent to you what I these days have preached in four sermons concerning Baptism; yet the poor must serve and thus also I want to serve you with my labor.
First, may I advise you to deal with the opposing doctrine without strife and rebuttal so that the God-descecrating tyrants do not think that you are preaching in order to incite them. Therefore make it clear that Baptism also appears to be taught in no different way than the Papists although they teach it very coldly. Nevertheless I wouldn't have you name them so that they appear to be shamed but that you deal with the matter very simply as is appropriate. The glories of Baptism are these:
It is a divine water that is given through the Word of God and from His command and not any little discovery of man; it is a new covenant of God with all men for eternal salvation; it is a work of God, not of men, and for this it is not corrupted by the sins of those who misuse it.
It is a one-time thing and cannnot be repeated without a blasphemous condemnation of the first Baptism and if this, likewise, is not a work of God which is beneficial if it is not received and held fast by faith.
It should be adorned outwardly with the fruits of faith in all of life; it is more exalted than all vows and works which otherwise have happened or may happen and also above obedience to parents and authorities.
It is honored by the appearance of the Father by a voice, by the Son in manhood, and by the Holy Spirit as a dove; this appearance is now included in these words: "In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."
This verse: "This is my beloved Son" and so on I have dealt with in this way: the Son is commended to us and declared to be the LOrd of all and the Bishop of souls in Whom all are well-pleasing, and withot Whom nothing is that we do; He alone is the King, because the Son is the Heir of all things; He alone is the Bishop because in Him everyone is acceptable. M. Georg will say the rest. On the Sunday Sexagesima (8 Feb.) Anno 1534. Your Martin Luther,D.
NOTE: Looks like the Bishop of Mainz was given notice as to the true and ultimate Bishop.
Hausmann, long in Zwickau, is now in Dessau. ML used to address Hausmann as the Bishop of Zwickau. "My superior" probably refers to Hausmann relative to ML in the Augustinian Order,
don't you think?
Grace and peace in Christ! M. Georg Held, in your name, dearest Hausmann, has requested that I might illustrate to you what you should preach concerning Baptism especially since your Prince has required this and since the Bishop in Mainz and his brother et al are to be the audience. Though you do not in this matter require my help very much since by God's grace you are rich in the Spirit and at the same time also M. Georg has likely sent to you what I these days have preached in four sermons concerning Baptism; yet the poor must serve and thus also I want to serve you with my labor.
First, may I advise you to deal with the opposing doctrine without strife and rebuttal so that the God-descecrating tyrants do not think that you are preaching in order to incite them. Therefore make it clear that Baptism also appears to be taught in no different way than the Papists although they teach it very coldly. Nevertheless I wouldn't have you name them so that they appear to be shamed but that you deal with the matter very simply as is appropriate. The glories of Baptism are these:
It is a divine water that is given through the Word of God and from His command and not any little discovery of man; it is a new covenant of God with all men for eternal salvation; it is a work of God, not of men, and for this it is not corrupted by the sins of those who misuse it.
It is a one-time thing and cannnot be repeated without a blasphemous condemnation of the first Baptism and if this, likewise, is not a work of God which is beneficial if it is not received and held fast by faith.
It should be adorned outwardly with the fruits of faith in all of life; it is more exalted than all vows and works which otherwise have happened or may happen and also above obedience to parents and authorities.
It is honored by the appearance of the Father by a voice, by the Son in manhood, and by the Holy Spirit as a dove; this appearance is now included in these words: "In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."
This verse: "This is my beloved Son" and so on I have dealt with in this way: the Son is commended to us and declared to be the LOrd of all and the Bishop of souls in Whom all are well-pleasing, and withot Whom nothing is that we do; He alone is the King, because the Son is the Heir of all things; He alone is the Bishop because in Him everyone is acceptable. M. Georg will say the rest. On the Sunday Sexagesima (8 Feb.) Anno 1534. Your Martin Luther,D.
NOTE: Looks like the Bishop of Mainz was given notice as to the true and ultimate Bishop.
Hausmann, long in Zwickau, is now in Dessau. ML used to address Hausmann as the Bishop of Zwickau. "My superior" probably refers to Hausmann relative to ML in the Augustinian Order,
don't you think?
Thursday, January 11, 2007
#2033a-T0 Leonhard Beier,Pastor in Zwickau
(Compare #,s 2018 and 2036)
To the highly honorable brother in Christ, Master Leonhard Beier, the faithful and plain Bishop of the Church in Zwickau.
Grace and peace in Christ! Concerning baptism about which you needed to ask my advice I have talked with ours and this is what we hold: First, that you should publicly teach as we here have long done that the women should completely refrain from such baptism since one who is not yet born cannot be reborn; otherwise there would be no basis present why a child should not be baptized in the mother's body by pouring water on the mother's body if there was fear about the danger in birth. One should pray and commend to God the fruit not yet born or those who die during birthing. That is the first. Secondly. This, your case with the child before birth or wanting to be born was baptized, because it is something in the past, this is the rule set down, that you baptize the boy anew, not as though his soul would have been lost had he died in between but because he is now grown, believes and requests baptism ( though his baptism might have been considered as nothing); this faith has protected him; but because that baptism was no baptism a he is not baptized a second time but simply baptized as if he had not been baptized. Though he was secure previously without baptism yet he must not now, since he can be baptized, not despise it. From time to time the women have a habit of deceiving in that they deny that they baptized because of the danger of death after birth or cast doubt on whether the baptism was done by the mid-wife or the woman and so they disavow either through their silence or a denial that the baptism was done. Here you must again teach that they should acknowlege publicly whether the baptism has been done. Thereupon there should not be baptism again but (the child) should be brought to the church and before the servants of the church and after the reading of the Gospel of Mark and the Our-Father and the laying on of hands the baptism ratified. Thus Baptism should be a Sacrament, that is , a public sign of confession and it must through the servants of the Church or through two or three women as witnesses attested (so the Word stands: in the mouth of two [Matthew 18:16] it is received and presented. )If it is only from one or from the mother alone bestowed it should be held as nothing. So also if the women are silent or deny that there was a baptism it should simply be baptized and those sort of women who gossip that it has been previously a baptism should not be believed.
The very same is to be held on the baptism of abandoned children: if there is a notice attached to them which says: This child has been baptized it is still a baptism without the witness of the church and not a public sign or sacrament and on that account not to be believed because it cannot be verified. And here there is no second baptism or an expedient for the Anabaptists. This condemns the baptism which is public and done according to right order in the church and to be sure, it is believed that this is a human and not a divine work. We, however, know and believe that it is not a man who baptizes but God Himself through the hand of the Church for this reason this dealing is God's own dealing. There you have what we have in this matter for an answer while we are involved with many projects. Be it well with you and pray for us as we also do for you in these last times . Monday after Paul's conversion (26 January) Anno 1534. Your Martin Luther, D.
To the highly honorable brother in Christ, Master Leonhard Beier, the faithful and plain Bishop of the Church in Zwickau.
Grace and peace in Christ! Concerning baptism about which you needed to ask my advice I have talked with ours and this is what we hold: First, that you should publicly teach as we here have long done that the women should completely refrain from such baptism since one who is not yet born cannot be reborn; otherwise there would be no basis present why a child should not be baptized in the mother's body by pouring water on the mother's body if there was fear about the danger in birth. One should pray and commend to God the fruit not yet born or those who die during birthing. That is the first. Secondly. This, your case with the child before birth or wanting to be born was baptized, because it is something in the past, this is the rule set down, that you baptize the boy anew, not as though his soul would have been lost had he died in between but because he is now grown, believes and requests baptism ( though his baptism might have been considered as nothing); this faith has protected him; but because that baptism was no baptism a he is not baptized a second time but simply baptized as if he had not been baptized. Though he was secure previously without baptism yet he must not now, since he can be baptized, not despise it. From time to time the women have a habit of deceiving in that they deny that they baptized because of the danger of death after birth or cast doubt on whether the baptism was done by the mid-wife or the woman and so they disavow either through their silence or a denial that the baptism was done. Here you must again teach that they should acknowlege publicly whether the baptism has been done. Thereupon there should not be baptism again but (the child) should be brought to the church and before the servants of the church and after the reading of the Gospel of Mark and the Our-Father and the laying on of hands the baptism ratified. Thus Baptism should be a Sacrament, that is , a public sign of confession and it must through the servants of the Church or through two or three women as witnesses attested (so the Word stands: in the mouth of two [Matthew 18:16] it is received and presented. )If it is only from one or from the mother alone bestowed it should be held as nothing. So also if the women are silent or deny that there was a baptism it should simply be baptized and those sort of women who gossip that it has been previously a baptism should not be believed.
The very same is to be held on the baptism of abandoned children: if there is a notice attached to them which says: This child has been baptized it is still a baptism without the witness of the church and not a public sign or sacrament and on that account not to be believed because it cannot be verified. And here there is no second baptism or an expedient for the Anabaptists. This condemns the baptism which is public and done according to right order in the church and to be sure, it is believed that this is a human and not a divine work. We, however, know and believe that it is not a man who baptizes but God Himself through the hand of the Church for this reason this dealing is God's own dealing. There you have what we have in this matter for an answer while we are involved with many projects. Be it well with you and pray for us as we also do for you in these last times . Monday after Paul's conversion (26 January) Anno 1534. Your Martin Luther, D.
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
#2033-To Johann Ruehel
To the respectable, celebrated Herr Johann Ruehel, both Doctor of law, and my favored Herr and dear god-father.
Grace and peace in Christ. Respectable, celebrated, dear Herr and god-father! Master Phillip does want to write anything to Herzheimer and has his own reasons. I think, however, your little fruits and plants in Halle now have played out their hypocrisy and have long enough carried the tree on both shoulders and now their hypocrisy in earnest is carried out. Therfore Herzheimer is advised that in time and with honor he should depart; the devil depends more on the priests and inciters since he has been cheated by you and me. God helping me I want to want to arm more people ab0ut the private-mass and completely anger well the devil. It may be that the first wrath will become the best and you are the one that can best hinder it. Nothing more than to be commended to God, Amen. My Kaethe greets you in a friendly way . Greet for me your flesh and blood. In every way that I know that I am able to serve Herzheimer I am ready and willing to do. 1534 the 25th of January. Martinus Luther, D.
Note: Difficult to translate "wie ihr mich doch oft mit ihm betrogen habt" but seems that ML and
Ruehel have cheated the devil. What do you think?
Grace and peace in Christ. Respectable, celebrated, dear Herr and god-father! Master Phillip does want to write anything to Herzheimer and has his own reasons. I think, however, your little fruits and plants in Halle now have played out their hypocrisy and have long enough carried the tree on both shoulders and now their hypocrisy in earnest is carried out. Therfore Herzheimer is advised that in time and with honor he should depart; the devil depends more on the priests and inciters since he has been cheated by you and me. God helping me I want to want to arm more people ab0ut the private-mass and completely anger well the devil. It may be that the first wrath will become the best and you are the one that can best hinder it. Nothing more than to be commended to God, Amen. My Kaethe greets you in a friendly way . Greet for me your flesh and blood. In every way that I know that I am able to serve Herzheimer I am ready and willing to do. 1534 the 25th of January. Martinus Luther, D.
Note: Difficult to translate "wie ihr mich doch oft mit ihm betrogen habt" but seems that ML and
Ruehel have cheated the devil. What do you think?
Saturday, January 06, 2007
#2032-To the Council in Kitzingen
To the honorable, perceptive Lords, Mayor and Council in Kitzingen, my favored Lords and good Friends.
G.u. (Grace and ) Peace in Christ. Honored, perceptive Lords and Friends! According to your request you have your Pastor Lord G.Schmaltzung. However because the way is distant and hard for him to come on means to live on, I request that you would be helpful to him as he is yet provided for your service, and no one at his expense can or should serve. Regarding Caplanens and so on he will well report to you: such person few and rare. Herewith be to God commended, Amen. On the day Fabianus 1534.. (Jan20).
Note: On St. Fabianus, see below. Caplaenen are assistants, I think.
G.u. (Grace and ) Peace in Christ. Honored, perceptive Lords and Friends! According to your request you have your Pastor Lord G.Schmaltzung. However because the way is distant and hard for him to come on means to live on, I request that you would be helpful to him as he is yet provided for your service, and no one at his expense can or should serve. Regarding Caplanens and so on he will well report to you: such person few and rare. Herewith be to God commended, Amen. On the day Fabianus 1534.. (Jan20).
Note: On St. Fabianus, see below. Caplaenen are assistants, I think.
Fabianus, Jan.20
Home > Catholic Encyclopedia > F > Pope St. Fabian
Pope St. Fabian
Catholic Encyclopedia on CD-ROMContains 11,632 articles. Browse off-line, ad-free, printer-friendly.Get it here for only $33 plus FREE shipping worldwide
(FABIANUS)
Pope (236-250), the extraordinary circumstances of whose election is related by Eusebius (Hist. Eccl., VI, 29). After the death of Anterus he had come to Rome, with some others, from his farm and was in the city when the new election began. While the names of several illustrious and noble persons were being considered, a dove suddenly descended upon the head of Fabian, of whom no one had even thought. To the assembled brethren the sight recalled the Gospel scene of the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Saviour of mankind, and so, divinely inspired, as it were, they chose Fabian with joyous unanimity and placed him in the Chair of Peter. During his reign of fourteen years there was a lull in the storm of persecution. Little is known of his pontificate. The "Liber Pontificalis" says that he divided Rome into seven districts, each supervised by a deacon, and appointed seven subdeacons, to collect, in conjunction with other notaries, the "acta" of the martyrs, i.e. the reports of the court-proceedings on the occasion of their trials (cf. Eus., VI, 43). There is a tradition that he instituted the four minor orders. Under him considerable work was done in the catacombs. He caused the body of Pope St. Pontianus to be exhumed, in Sardinia, and transferred to the catacomb of St. Callistus at Rome. Later accounts, more or less trustworthy, attribute to him the consecration (245) of seven bishops as missionaries to Gaul, among them St. Denys of Paris (Greg. of Tours, Hist. Francor., I, 28, 31). St. Cyprian mentions (Ep., 59) the condemnation by Fabian for heresy of a certain Privatus (Bishop of Lambaesa) in Africa. The famous Origen did not hesitate to defend, before Fabian, the orthodoxy of his teaching (Eus. Hist. Eccl., VI, 34). Fabian died a martyr (20 Jan., 250) at the beginning of the Decian persecution, and was buried in the Crypt of the Popes in the catacomb of St. Callistus, where in recent times (1850) De Rossi discovered his Greek epitaph (Roma Sotterranea II, 59): "Fabian, bishop and martyr." The decretals ascribed to him in Pseudo-Isidore are apocryphal
Pope St. Fabian
Catholic Encyclopedia on CD-ROMContains 11,632 articles. Browse off-line, ad-free, printer-friendly.Get it here for only $33 plus FREE shipping worldwide
(FABIANUS)
Pope (236-250), the extraordinary circumstances of whose election is related by Eusebius (Hist. Eccl., VI, 29). After the death of Anterus he had come to Rome, with some others, from his farm and was in the city when the new election began. While the names of several illustrious and noble persons were being considered, a dove suddenly descended upon the head of Fabian, of whom no one had even thought. To the assembled brethren the sight recalled the Gospel scene of the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Saviour of mankind, and so, divinely inspired, as it were, they chose Fabian with joyous unanimity and placed him in the Chair of Peter. During his reign of fourteen years there was a lull in the storm of persecution. Little is known of his pontificate. The "Liber Pontificalis" says that he divided Rome into seven districts, each supervised by a deacon, and appointed seven subdeacons, to collect, in conjunction with other notaries, the "acta" of the martyrs, i.e. the reports of the court-proceedings on the occasion of their trials (cf. Eus., VI, 43). There is a tradition that he instituted the four minor orders. Under him considerable work was done in the catacombs. He caused the body of Pope St. Pontianus to be exhumed, in Sardinia, and transferred to the catacomb of St. Callistus at Rome. Later accounts, more or less trustworthy, attribute to him the consecration (245) of seven bishops as missionaries to Gaul, among them St. Denys of Paris (Greg. of Tours, Hist. Francor., I, 28, 31). St. Cyprian mentions (Ep., 59) the condemnation by Fabian for heresy of a certain Privatus (Bishop of Lambaesa) in Africa. The famous Origen did not hesitate to defend, before Fabian, the orthodoxy of his teaching (Eus. Hist. Eccl., VI, 34). Fabian died a martyr (20 Jan., 250) at the beginning of the Decian persecution, and was buried in the Crypt of the Popes in the catacomb of St. Callistus, where in recent times (1850) De Rossi discovered his Greek epitaph (Roma Sotterranea II, 59): "Fabian, bishop and martyr." The decretals ascribed to him in Pseudo-Isidore are apocryphal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)